Search for: "Hardy v. Mays" Results 1 - 20 of 396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Hardie v Herald  and Weekly Times ([2016]  VSCA 103), the plaintiff, Ms Raelene Hardie, was a part owner and manager of a strip club in rural Victoria called “Club Rawhide”. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had a guest post in this blog providing a descriptive comment on the decision of the two judge Bench in Union of India v Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc (2018: SCI)("Hardy I") referring the matter to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:52 pm by David Jacobson
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17 and appeals relating to 6 other non-executive directors of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”) the High Court allowed ASIC’s appeals and held that each director breached his or her duties as a director of the company by approving the company’s release of a misleading announcement to the Australian Stock Exchange (“ASX”). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:02 am
"*The ALJ, however, said that he “could not recommend a penalty due” as Hardy had already resigned from his position.* The serving of the charges prior to his or her resignation may not be critical with respect to proceeding with the disciplinary action depending on the controlling rule or regulation. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
These chairs and this sedan were closer to the road than Hardy and Myers' tent. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm by Jason Byrne
Hardy, No. 144327 pending before the Supreme Court may resolve issues in the present application. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:34 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will also review the recent Federal Circuit decision in Enfish v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:53 am by Jeff Welty
  The idea that an alleged victim may offer some assistance in a defendant’s criminal case in exchange for a favorable civil settlement is also reflected in 98 FEO 19 (stating that a victim’s attorney ethically may “propos[e] that [a] [v]ictim will acquiesce to [a favorable] plea agreement in exchange for a confession of judgment from [a defendant]”). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]